Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Veterans Day Is “A Coming” But Never Gets Here – Buzz Davis

Veterans' Day 2009 is coming November 11th. But for most vets it never gets here.

World War I, a tremendous slaughter, ended 11 AM, November 11, 1918. The United States Civil War was one of the first highly mechanized wars in the world where the killing power of soldiers was multiplied greatly from times gone by. The machine gun was new. That war was a slaughter also.

After WWI, the war to end all wars, we just keep on having wars. We have two and a half wars going now that are bankrupting our nation and ruining million of young people and killing so many men, women and children.

In 1924 Congress passed a bill that US veterans would receive $1.50 per day for each day they served during WWI. They were to collect the money in 1945. Congress probably figured most would be dead by '45.

The stock market crashed, the Depression hit and in 1932 over 15,000 poor vets and their families, many homeless, struggled to D.C. asking Congress and President Hoover for early payment of their $1.50 per day.

They never got it.

The House passed a bill giving them immediate payment. The Senate voted 62 to 18 to deny the early bonus. The vote wasn't even close. Vets and their family members tent camped just across the Anacostia River from the Capitol. A month later the Bonus army was still in DC marching. They stayed, wanting the bonus, and many had nowhere to go. A conflict with police occurred, guns fired, two marchers were killed.

Hoover ordered the Army to "remove" them. General MacArthur, Major Eisenhower and Major Patton's cavalry on horses and in tanks, and soldiers with fixed bayonets throwing tear gas did just that. They pushed the vets, women and kids from the Capitol to their camp across the river. Hoover ordered a halt. MacArthur disobeyed. Soldiers tore through the camp of 10,000 families, families fled, it was burnt, two babies died, many were wounded -- the bonus army was defeated by fellow military members and their own government. Small wonder Roosevelt won the November election.

Makes you sick? It does me.

As a member of Veterans for Peace, we try to work as hard to help make peace in this world as we did to help make war. We fail just like the Bonus Army did - but we keep trying.

My friend's son is back from the Middle East wars with serious injuries – PTSD and others. The NAACP ad says, "A mind is a terrible thing to waste." Well, it is also terrible to have your mind turn on you and try to "waste" you. I have another friend who is very active in progressive movements and I asked her one day what makes her so active. She said he husband came back from Vietnam with PTSD and has been afraid of leaving their home for the last 30 years.

These wars cost too much. But corrupt politicians and the military industrial complex, which President Eisenhower identified but did not have the courage to fight - just as he did not have the courage to fight MacArthur so many years ago at that camp of poor vets and their families, have us in their claws.

When will we ever throw them off? "When will we ever learn?" The nearly 10,000 members of Veterans for Peace in our nation do not intend to be blown away by the wind. We, and you, must fight to make our nation work for peace harder than we work for war.

We need to have every young person and all the 15 million unemployed serve our nation in a national service corps, trained, equipped and paid to work for peace in our own communities and across the world. Two or three years of paid hard work to help build a better world is what is needed from each of us.

We need a Department of Peace twice as big as our Department of War and cut military spending in half as a starter. We need to bring the troops home from the fiascos in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. We need to ask and empower the United Nations to come in and help clean up our mess in the Middle East. We need our Senate to not double cross us on healthcare for all as they double-crossed the millions of vets and their family members during the Great Depression. We need a president who leads us out of lost wars, back to the rule of law, helps our people rather than corrupt bankers, and punishes those who plan and conduct illegal wars and torture.

The call is great. Not answering the call will be a disaster for our nation.

Buzz Davis is a former VISTA Volunteer, Army officer, elected official from Stoughton, a retired state government planner. He trained as an Army infantry officer during the Vietnam War and served in S. Korea 1969-'70. dbuzzdavis at aol.com. Buzz is a member of the Clarence Kailin chapter of Veterans For Peace.

Looking Back At Our Future? – Elton Tylenda

11/11/09

This is the 40th Armistice (now called Veterans) Day since my return from the war on Vietnam. It's disheartening to note the similarities between Vietnam and the "quagmires accomplished" in Iraq and Afghanistan. The same patterns are being repeated but the numbers and costs are higher:

  • psychological trauma is more pervasive and active duty suicides are steadily increasing;
  • the number of brain injuries are exponentially higher and the cost of treatment will be staggering;
  • the chemicals and depleted uranium used today will be more devastating to civilians and to US soldiers than was "agent orange" which killed and continues to maim millions;
  • today's war profiteers are more numerous and getting richer. A KBR mercenary confided to me that he expects to leave Iraq as a millionaire. KBR (Kellogg Brown & Root) is a subsidiary of Halliburton, which got "no bid" contracts for sending mercenaries to Vietnam as well. At nearly a quarter million today, mercenaries may soon outnumber our comparatively low paid, barely equipped, "poverty drafted" troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and other clandestine venues.

I wasn't surprised to hear that KBR mercenaries were being investigated for defrauding the US government, stealing from the Iraqi government and running a prostitution ring there. I witnessed the same pattern in Vietnam. A Halliburton mercenary, paid many times more than I to supervise our engineering unit in Vietnam, never showed up for work. He did, however, stop by to promote one of his business enterprises. The US military ran an open prostitution camp near Ahn Khe called "Sin City" and he wanted us to know his girls were on the left when entering the camp. He assured us they were the best girls money could buy, checked once a week by military doctors and so on. More examples of the fraud, Black Market activities, and payoffs to the enemy that I witnessed in Vietnam are described in the award winning book "Long Shadows: Veterans Paths to Peace" edited by David Giffey – intro by Howard Zinn.

The cost to those we savagely attack increases as well. If we experienced casualties in the US proportional to those in Iraq, it would mean that:

  • every person in the cities of Baltimore, Boston, Dallas, Philadelphia, San Diego, San Francisco and Seattle would be dead;
  • every single person in the states of Delaware, Idaho, Nebraska, Nevada, New York and Oregon would be wounded;
  • the entire populations of Ohio and New Jersey would be homeless; and everyone
  • in the states of Michigan, Indiana and Kentucky would be refugees in Canada or Mexico.

That's what our blood and treasure and nearly eight years of effort have accomplished for Iraq. Recall the military assessment following nearly total destruction in Vietnam: "We had to destroy the village [city, country] in order to save it." Once again the lion's share of hundreds of billions is directed toward killing and destroying. Very little is effectively channeled into reconstruction except for permanent American military bases. Nonetheless, we hear again the idle chatter about "winning the hearts and minds" of the people – people we called gooks and slants back then - people our troops call rag heads and sand niggers today. The working version was/is: "grab 'em by the testicles and their hearts and minds will follow."

Once the masters of war get the gravy train and propaganda machine up to speed, it's hard to stop. Many of the influential power mongers and war profiteers in America are violent Christian fundamentalists. Bush was speaking to them when he called his wars of aggression "a crusade." The founder of Blackwater USA, the world's largest mercenary army, Erik Prince, called his kill-for-profit mercenaries "crusaders for Christ." Watergate felon Chuck Colson and other leaders of the "End Times" movement speak openly about a hundred years war against Islam. Their rhetoric is chillingly similar to that of the German Christians who supported Hitler's "holy war" against Jews. We are given a scapegoat over there to distract us from the enemies at home - those who deceptively start and orchestrate wars of aggression.

A different future will require greater awareness of the "big lies" used to start wars. We need to recognize the pattern and address the right questions to officials before rushing into war. The pattern is plain:


  • the "Tonkin Gulf incident" which ignited the Vietnam War, was fabricated by US officials;
  • the "Polish attack" on Gleiwitz, Germany which Hitler used as pretense for invading Poland and igniting WWII, was staged by SS Chief, Heinrich Himmler, using concentration camp victims;
  • a declassified archival document lists eight "provocations" secretly initiated against the Japanese. The Pearl Harbor attack could not have been a surprise to those who formulated that list nor to those who implemented those "provocations" prior to 12/7/41. Perhaps they WERE surprised that it took the most extreme provocation listed (cutting off Japan's oil supply – an undeclared act of war) to goad Japan to react to US aggression.
  • The lies told to us in the lead up to the illegal attack on Iraq are too numerous to list but the biggest lie of all is what we've been told about the "New Pearl Harbor," or, 9/11 attack that started the pre-planned war of aggression against Afghanistan.

Confronting so big a lie will be extremely difficult but absolutely necessary if we are to break the repeating pattern of official deception. The power of the big lie was described by Adolf Hitler: "…in the greatness of the lie there is always a certain potency of believability…they more easily fall victims to the big lie than the small one…Even when faced with the facts in such a case, they will still linger in doubt and waver and continue to suppose that there must be some truth to it."

The official 9/11 Commission Report, spoon fed to us by Bush/Cheney insiders, is replete with lies, misinformation and whopping omissions (e.g., the collapse of tower # 7 that same afternoon is not even mentioned). It claims to be an investigative report but 571 pages later we're left with magic, miracle and mystery. Magically the massive center columns of the towers were made to disappear. Miraculously, the laws of physics were suspended with the claim that near free fall speeds were attained without the aid of explosives. And, we're left with the unexplained mystery of the molten steel and inextinguishable fires that burned for weeks at ground zero. As of this writing, nearly 1,000 architects and engineers have publicly voiced opposition to this particular example of Bush administration pseudo-science.

Reality based science offers a simple but chilling resolution to the magic, miracle and mystery of the official report. Physicist Steven Jones reported finding traces of nanothermite (the US military's most advanced incendiary explosive) on a piece of steel recovered from ground zero. In controlled demolitions, core columns are sliced into sections (no magic needed); a building can attain actual free fall velocity (no miracle needed); and the signature ending includes molten metal and inextinguishable fires which eliminates even the "deepest mystery" reported by the NY Times. Regarding tower # 7, the lease holder of all three collapsed buildings, Larry Silverstein, admitted that # 7 was taken down by controlled demolition (America Rebuilds – PBS 2002). As we all witnessed that day, there were no signs of pancaked layers. Everything was reduced to fragments and swirling dust clouds, no bodies were recovered but bone fragments were found on surrounding building tops – ditto, controlled demolition.

Instead of hiding our heads in the sand, let's take a stand and demand a credible investigation of this horrific crime. Together we can prevent the future becoming a repeat of the past – yes we can!

Elton Tylenda Member – Veterans for Peace

Elton@wisdompeacepath.org

Elton is a member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans for Peace.

Take health care burden off backs of industry – Gail Price

The Capital Times

Gail Price | Posted: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:00 am

Dear Editor: Thank goodness this health care issue has finally gotten past some of the misinformation and just plain foolish fear that people have been subjected to about it. I was so relieved and grateful to get old enough to be able to get Medicare -- it has saved me about $6,000 a year! To spend on other things -- to help the economy! My medical service has been fine.

I also believe that in order to improve our economy in the long run we need to re-establish our manufacturing base in this country and we need to take the burden of health care off the backs of industry in order to be competitive with the rest of the world that already provides universal health care.

Gail Price, Madison

Gail is an associate member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans for Peace.

Health care OK makes history – David Couper

The Capital Times

David Couper | Posted: Wednesday, November 11, 2009 5:00 am

Dear Editor: It's great making history! This historic accomplishment occurred on Saturday, Nov. 7, when the House of Representatives passed H.R. 3962 — the Affordable Health Care for America Act. I think these efforts go back to when I was a lad in high school when Harry Truman was our president.

Our representatives who voted for this bill deserve our praise and thanks. I am sure the lobbyists for the insurance and pharmaceutical industries put on a full court press -- yet House members withstood it and took the right action because it was the right thing to do.

I now urge the Senate to continue the fight, which is to provide secure and stable coverage for all Americans with insurance, to expand coverage for those who do not have insurance, and to lower cost for families and businesses! Finally, we are on the right track.

David Couper, Blue Mounds

David is a member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans for Peace.

Thursday, October 15, 2009

Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and Wisconsin Veterans: Information for Policy Makers on the Availability of Clinical, Social, Legal, and Preventative Services

What a title, only when you combine a legislative bureaucracy and an institutional bureaucracy.

Today I attended the Assembly Veterans and Military Affairs Committee on PTSD, I will be abbreviating as PTS since this is not a disorder and as mentioned by one of the speakers it is a normal result of the abnormality that the person deployed had been exposed to. The hearing was held due to the representatives valid concerns about 3200 members of the Wisconsin National Guard returning to the state around January. Although traditional veterans groups like the VFW and American Legion were personally invited I found out about the event from a fellow Veterans For Peace member who works in the media and was most likely alerted via press release. The stated purpose at the hearing was so that legislators had a firm understanding of the help available for PTS.

The first speaker was Dr. Dean Krahn who has this bio posted on the UW Psychiatry website: Professor of Psychiatry; Chief, Mental Health Service Line at VA-Madison and Director, Mental Health Service Line for the Great Lakes Network of VA. According to him due to recent outreach efforts and budget efforts years after the War of Terror began the VA mental health personnel around the country has increased 42 per cent since 2005. There are now double the people in Madison at 130.

The next speaker was Jean Bromley, MSW, OEF/OIF VISN 12 Lead and Milwaukee Program Manager. She highlighted the outreach done to reach veterans on campuses, at drill weekends, WDVA events like the Supermarket held in Marshfield recently. She also discussed the Post Deployment Health Reassessment (PDHRA) (Est. 2005) that is done 90 to 180 days post deployment to address concerns and provide care for the veteran. This is mandatory for all active and Reserve members, not for the Guard because of the dual role they have other assessments that I will discuss later and other speakers talked about. For Wisconsin there is the Yellow Ribbon Reintegration program that is 30, 60, and 90 days post deployment. At these events the veteran can enroll in VA health care. The USMC since this year has been holding IRR musters, which I couldn't find in any media but there is media of IRR musters for other reasons, to let them know about signing up for the VA and providing other important information for them. The focus of these different programs and gatherings is to provide tools and skills for reentry into civilian life. It seems that the word on the street that the Navy TAPS program is very good compared to Army and Marines is right otherwise they would only need to provide info on VA benefits and help getting them at these events. She went on to say that over 280000 service members/veterans had completed the PDHRA and over 104000 service members/veterans have been referred to a Vet Center of the VA. The top five diagnoses for servicemembers at these events, both men and women, are PTS, depression, back pain, knee/joint pain, and excessive tobacco usage. The ranking changes for the sexes but not the issues they are facing. To wrap up what I recorded for her comments, she mentioned that only half of those who were found to have PTS and referenced to a Vet Center or VA were getting care for PTS.

After these two speakers there were a few questions which were interesting. According to Dr. Krahn there are three ways that a veteran can receive care: Inpatient, Outpatient and via residential services. As part of inpatient care there are Community Based Outreach Centers or CBOCs, which he quipped is a popular acronym on CSPAN (too bad I don't have cable anymore since it is the only way to find out what is actually said nowadays with all of the news commentators instead of reporters). These CBOC can provide assessments and basically the same services as the VA for veterans who are not near a VA center just by billing the VA. There is also a rise in telemental health services being offered at CBOCs which was a concern in this 1999 report. This is a system where a $3000 camera/CPU device is used at a CBOC, and now at college campuses, which links the veteran to a VA where they can receive treatment without the trip from the rural area to the VA center. They said there was data that telemental health works as well as in person meetings but didn't say where it came from. The Uniform Services Package for Mental Health document mandates what the CBOCs must provide in terms of mental health help. From the new head of the VA, Shinseki, a directive has been created to determine whether the PTS treatment is working and making the symptoms lessen or worsening each time the veteran is seen. He is also directing outreach similar to that in Wisconsin to get veterans into the VA and building bridges with veterans. One concern with his directive on PTS and evaluating whether treatment is working or not is the BATTLEMIND program the Army is currently using. This training teaches resiliency and claims to be a way to avoid PTS but may be a way to teach military members how to shut down their brain when it comes to trauma just like they have been taught to do when it comes to killing. One comment at the end was a link between Porchlight and per diem housing to get a 20 unit place in Madison in the near future to serve homeless veterans.

Tracey L. Smith was the next speaker and described complex PTS as PTS from the childhood which is compounded by further trauma later in life. She said that there is no data on multiple deployments and the rate of PTS but only that the number of firefights is the factor which PTS increases and once a certain number is reach the PTS rate levels out. Also mentioned was that the high number of suicides but that they primarily occur in one or zero deployment members. She referenced an Institute of Medicine study from Oct. 2007 but all I can find online is that it was rather inconclusive regarding treatments for PTS. The VA is using large scale psychotherapy trainings and follow-ups for its personnel. Two therapies used are Cognitive Processing Therapy which is 12 - 1 hour session including where the veteran must write in detail their most traumatic experience and Prolonged Exposure Therapy which wasn't described that well. Their results show that OEF/OIF veterans get better results from the treatments than Vietnam veterans. She offered that it may be because they are receiving treatment sooner after the trauma. 7 out of 10 veterans refuse mental health services even if they are offered due to the stigma which besides the rural problem is a main concern when gettinng vets to come to the VA.

The next speaker was David Hosking, Global War on Terrorism Outreach Readjustment Counselor Madison Wisconsin Vet Center. He served for a total of 28 years and would probably still be in if allowed. He was in Vietnam and Iraq although was wearing a flight jacket with wings so I don't know what his MOS was. His talk was to read off the powerpoint slides and he seemed to like he had PTS or social anxiety, think Tom Smykowski from Office Space the people person. He talks to all units that demobilize through Fort McCoy to discuss the Vet Centers, CVSOs, Workforce Devlopment and other governmental programs available to veterans. One question from Rep. Hubler was about getting a call from a constituent who wanted help for a veteran loved one. He said that they should call the Vet Center and the Vet Center will set up and appointment for them in their locale.

Next up was Col. Kenneth Koon, Director of Manpower and Personnel at Wisconsin National Guard. He descibed a number of things including the Yellow Ribbon program, Battlemind, and resiliency Training as ways to help with trauma. In 2008 more National Guard members committed suicide thatn died in combat. According to him 60 per cent had never deployed.

The next speakers described the Veterans Court process, Krista Ginger (Public Defender) and Bil Klister (WDVA). These courts now exist in 7 states with New York the first in Buffalo started last year. In Wisconsin there is one in Rock County in VISN 12 and one to start in Eau Claire County in VISN 23 in the near future.

Following this there was questions about the telemental health services. They are springing up on campuses around the state. UW Plattteville was the pilot in Spring 2008 with 4 individuals receiving 7 sessions. In the Fall of 2008 there were 6 to 8 routine veterans receiving service. Later this fall UW Whitewater will start and UW Parkside and Oshkosh will follow. UW Eau Claire will be starting this fall but is under control of the Twin Cities VISN.

The session was then brought to a close.

My one question I jotted down early which was never answered except that we need to do more outreach is how to get past the VA stigma. When I first got into the VA and was getting physical therapy for my arm injury, thanks health insurance industry for forcing me to get socialized medicine, I was deeply depressed every time I had to go to the hospital. It is a very unwelcoming place to be. Also they never mentioned one alternative treatment that was available or that had been tested to be effective. One of their main talking points was that they want to focus on using what works as proven by research not what the practitioner thinks works or has been doing for a long time, so why no other methods besides their own?

Friday, September 25, 2009

F-16s' roar worse in Afghanistan, Iraq - Craig Fabian

Wisconsin State Journal
Posted: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 5:45 pm

Craig and Steve Books at the White House following the 2009 Veterans for Peace Convention.

At 3:25 a.m. Tuesday, the roar of F-16s taking off at Truax Field woke me and I assume many of my neighbors.

Many people in Afghanistan and Iraq probably hear the same noise, but they hear the explosions of the ordnance well before the roar of the engines. Death and destruction all around them, the survivors are displaced to tents and elsewhere, starving and dying slowly.

I ask President Barack Obama: Is it about the Taliban or is it about lining the pockets of the corporations that make the ordnance?

Gen. Stan McChrystal wants more troops to stop the Taliban. The Soviets had half a million and left defeated. The Brits tried three times and left. We, too, will leave without winning anything, except benefits for corporations.

Many economic conscripts fighting for unobtainable goals return to the United States with permanent damage. Amputations and mental health issues will cost the current generation years of their lives. Many may never recover. These vets will need assistance forever. Will this government provide for them? If history repeats itself, the answer is no.

Crimes against humanity is what I call it. Obama, stop this nonsense.

Craig Fabian, Madison
Craig is a member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans for Peace.

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Loss of Fitchburg Star disappointing

The Capital Times

9/01/2009 6:36 am

Dear Editor: We were shocked and disappointed when we learned that the Fitchburg Star will no longer be.

For the last several years, we have learned to look forward to the excellent, in-depth articles that Kurt Gutknecht has put into each issue. We can honestly say that he has provided in-depth coverage of goings-on in Fitchburg, as well as occasional coverage of other things occurring elsewhere in Wisconsin or the U.S. (or the world). The trends in eliminating newspapers in the U.S. do not bode well for an educated and illuminated citizenry.

We urge Kurt to continue his coverage of events in and around Fitchburg, and if he wants to start up an online newspaper, we will be the first to subscribe. Few things worth anything are free and the information Kurt provides is certainly worth our financial support. Go, Kurt!

John Fournelle and Judi Munaker, Fitchburg

John is a member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans for Peace.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Respect is the main lesson of 'suds summit'

SAT., AUG 1, 2009 - 4:10 PM
Wisconsin State Journal
By DAVID COUPER

The "suds summit" is over.
After nearly two weeks of furor and national introspection, President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden met with the professor and the cop.
The professor said: "We hit it off right from the beginning. When he's not arresting you, Sergeant Crowley is a really likable guy."
The cop said: "What you had today was two gentlemen who agreed to disagree on a particular issue."
But two "gentlemen" two weeks ago had a major disagreement that ended up in the White House.
Was this the teaching moment in American race relations that many of us were hoping for, or was it something else? To me, this is more about class than race. And the real issue is whether the police have to keep calm under provocation and not use arrest as a way to try to gain respect from citizens.
In my first year as a police officer, a wise old sergeant gave me some good advice. I had exchanged heated words with a person I had stopped for a traffic violation. Afterward, the sergeant took me aside and told me: "David, it's our job to keep our cool when everyone else is losing theirs. That's what police do."
He also didn't believe that disrespecting the police, "contempt of cop," was something that should prompt an arrest.
His advice served me well during almost a decade patrolling high-crime, inner-city Minneapolis. And it stayed with me when I became chief of the Madison Police Department.
It was why, when I first came to Madison, I said my job was to build a department of police officers who were also "human behavior experts" -- police officers who were able to understand the problems police get themselves into.
Depending on who tells the story about what happened on the afternoon of July 16, it goes something like this: A black college professor returning home from vacation is unable to open his front door. He forces the door open and enters just as a suspicious neighbor calls police. A white police sergeant arrives and asks the homeowner for identification.
Heated words are exchanged inside the home. The professor is asked to step outside where he is arrested for disorderly conduct. He is handcuffed, taken to the police station, booked, photographed, and, about four hours later, charges are dropped and the professor is released.
In the inner city, this is not an unusual occurrence. What made this case different was that Henry Louis Gates is a Harvard professor. And what really made it different was Sgt. James Crowley feeling he had been disrespected.
Civil rights advocates say this proves the police are racially profiling. Police leaders say it has nothing to do with race and citizens should cooperate with police -- not insult them.
There are explanations, excuses and counter-charges from all sides.
But class and respect are the best explanations for what went wrong. It was a meeting between two men wanting respect in a society not conditioned to give it to them.
Comedian Rodney Dangerfield joked about wanting a "little respect," but this is no joking matter -- and Rodney didn't wear a badge and carry a gun.
And that's why the responsibility here is clearly and primarily on the police. They are the representatives of our government and the protectors of our Constitution. They are, and should be trained, to keep their cool because often citizens do not keep theirs.
Respect does not come from using either fear or force. Police earn the community's respect by staying calm -- even under a barrage of hostile and contemptible language.
This does not mean that police should no nothing when they are physically pushed or shoved. Gates did not lay his hands on Crowley nor push him. If he had, I might not be writing this.
President Obama may have spoken too quickly in calling the actions of the police "stupid." But the officer's action was unnecessary. This arrest should not have happened. Period.
If my old sergeant were still alive and had sat in on the "beer summit," he would have told them all to settle down. And as he was leaving, I am sure he would take Crowley aside and remind him that it's our job to keep our cool -- even when Harvard professors don't.
Couper, Blue Mounds, served as Madison police chief from 1972 to 1993. He is also a member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans For Peace.

Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Health care rally coverage missing

MON., JUL 27, 2009 - 5:34 PM

Wisconsin State Journal

As a longtime State Journal subscriber I was disappointed that you did not give any coverage to the Saturday health care march and rally at the state Capitol.

There were about 1,000 people there with banners and signs, led by a brassy New Orleans-style band cakewalking up State Street.

U.S. Rep. Tammy Baldwin spoke out for a single-payer plan, as did people who thought they had decent insurance but had their claims for critical care denied. An emergency room doctor from UW Hospital described the plight of a newly diagnosed diabetic who couldn't afford his insulin.

When we are in a health care crisis, it confounds me that the State Journal chose to give front-page coverage to Civil War re-enactors at Camp Randall rather than efforts to change our health care delivery system that will affect everybody.

-- Richard Chamberlin, Monona

Richard is a member of the Clarence Kailin chapter of Veterans for Peace.

Monday, June 8, 2009

Why the Torture Photos Should Be Released - A Call to Vote No on War Funding Bill

Recently Senators Lieberman and Graham authored a horrendous addition to the 2009 War Supplemental bill. Their addition says "a photograph that was taken between September 11, 2001 and January 22, 2009 relating to the treatment of individuals engaged, captured, or detained after September 11, 2001, by the Armed Forces of the United States in operations outside of the United States" will not become public if "the disclosure of that photograph would endanger—(A) citizens of the United States; or(B) members of the Armed Forces or employees of the United States Government deployed outside the United States." The photograph has to be certified "endgangering" by the SecDef in consultation with the Chair of the JCS.

The New York Times recently ran an op-ed saying that Obama is right in calling for torture photos to not be released. The author, Philip Gourevitch, is also the co- author with Errol Morris of a book titiled: The Ballad of Abu Ghraib in which he interviews the military members who served at Abu Grhraib but says at the end that no photos are in the book because they can be found elsewhere. To support his op-ed he says, "They are mistaken. Just as it was a public service to release the Abu Ghraib photographs five years ago, Mr. Obama is right today to say we don't need more of them.

The president claims that a new round of images of prisoner abuse flashing around the globe would enflame America's enemies and endanger our troops in Afghanistan and Iraq. There's no doubt about it: the policies that the photographs depict have already done terrible damage to America's cause.

But there's another critical consideration. Releasing additional photographs would not be telling us anything that we don't already know. We don't need to see a picture to know that American interrogators used waterboarding — a crime our military has prosecuted as torture for more than a century — when we can see former Vice President Dick Cheney taking credit for having people waterboarded."

What Gourevitch, Morris, and Obama fail to comprehend is that we must show our military members and society at large what is unacceptable not by separating out a few bad apples as Bush called them. Obama has committed similar mistakes in saying that "what was carried out in the past by a small number of individuals" when describing the torture. According to Edward Tick, the author of War and the Soul, we "must expose atrocities as soon as possible to curb troops from giving free rein to their primal impulses."… "Most offenders in these modern massacres (My Lai, No Gun Ri, Abu Ghraib) have been ordinary people, not sadists or psychopaths." They are simply a product of their situation, what Rober Jay Lifton calls an "atrocity-producing situation." "When fear, threat, violence, loss, proximity to death, moral confusion, alienation, disbelief, immersion in horror, power, and control over others, and sheer exhaustion coincide long enough - and when the enemy has been sufficiently dehumanized – we are in an atrocity-producing situation." This situation allows normal people, not bad apples, not a small number of individuals, our brothers and sisters in the military to descend into horrific action sometimes condoned by their superiors. By singling out supposed bad apples, the behavior is not properly condoned. To prevent future actions we must show what has been done and reinforce that this is unacceptable behavior from a bad situation that can be committed by any person who is thrust into such a situation. To prevent them from committing it we must open our soul to the brutality and commit to showing that it is unacceptable no matter how bad of a position someone may be placed in.

The same New York Times op-ed shows those committing and documenting their acts thought it to be wrong but were never told it was wrong. "What were the pictures for? "Just to show what was going on," Ms. Harman said. To say, "Look, I have proof, you can't deny it." Sometimes she and her fellow guards posed alongside their abused wards, but most of her photos from Abu Ghraib have a purely documentary quality — solitary prisoners, stripped and manacled in their cells, stretched over bed frames or forced to balance on a box. Cpl. Charles Graner, the M.P. in charge of the night shift on the intelligence block that fall, also took photographs. And Corporal Graner, too, spoke of his snapshots as a form of "proof." He showed the pictures to his superior officers, medics, lawyers.

Later, he told Army investigators how he had routinely beat up prisoners for interrogators, or kept them up all night, making them crawl naked back and forth across the floor. "Was all this stuff wrong?" he said. "Yeah." But his point was that it was no secret. He kept getting praised for his work."

In reading Tick's book it is clear that as a nation if we are to reconcile our conscience we must acknowledge wrongdoing and talk about it instead of hiding it and placing blame on individuals. By adding such a ridiculous earmark to the war funding bill, Sen. Lieberman and Graham are harming our nation. The request by the ACLU for the photos asks for the investigative files for the photos not just the photo itself deflating Gourevitch's argument that "Photographs cannot show us a chain of command, or Washington decision making. Photographs cannot tell stories. They can only provide evidence of stories, and evidence is mute; it demands investigation and interpretation." There is an old saying that the truth shall set us free. If we are truly a beacon of what the world should be we should release torture photos and work for peace and prosperity instead of just talking about it while doing the complete opposite.

There are many other reasons to oppose the 2009 War Supplemental, but including legislation banning the release of torture photos is important enough by itself to call for a vote against it.

Todd Dennis is a U.S. Submarine Service veteran, a board member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans For Peace and the President of the Madison Chapter of Iraq Veterans Against the War. He is currently an outreach staff member at the Wisconsin Network for Peace and Justice. He has a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin and a B.S. in Physics from the University of Wisconsin - Eau Claire.

Obama's letting Bush team decide when to end wars

Daryl is a member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans for Peace

Obama's letting Bush team decide when to end wars
The Capital Times
6/06/2009 7:01 am

Dear Editor: Perpetual war.It seems there was a bunch of neo-cons in the Bush bunch that believed we should have this -- I suppose for the war profits that would go to their friends. Americans rose up to definitively reject the present wars, let alone an infinite series of successors, by electing Barack Obama president-- who as a candidate promised to get us out by 2010 at the latest.

But President Obama retained a lot of the Bush team: the secretary of defense and all the generals leading the wars, and he appointed a hawkish secretary of state. It appears the hawkish advisers have persuaded him to at least let them squawk about 10-year wars, and to expand the Afghan war into Pakistan and put 20,000 more troops there. As someone who strongly supported Mr. Obama, I am very distressed at the direction in which he seems to be going. I would urge him to force Gen. George Casey to disown his remarks about a 10-year war in Iraq or fire him if he will not. He should also consider replacing any other general who will not support his policies.

Lastly, I would strongly urge him to state publicly and unequivocally that he intends to remove all troops and bases from the Middle East, Afghanistan and Pakistan as soon as possible.

Daryl Sherman, Madison

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Another story 21- by David Giffey

Each year Memorial Day brings forth speeches, editorials, essays, poems, songs, and other attempts by survivors and non-participants to comprehend and justify war. The libraries of war songs and stories grow over time in inverse proportion to our collective memory of the harsh realities of death, destruction, and disruption that are the essence of war.

Fading memories seem unable to bear what really happened.

Was that true for my grandfather? I can only speculate, born 15 years, as I was, after grandpa died in 1926.

His first name was Herman. Information about him is limited but compelling, as collected by my brother, our family’s faithful historian.

Grandpa’s obituary, published under the headline “Veteran is Buried Tues.,” tells many stories. He died in 1926 at a son’s house in the Town of Springvale, Fond du Lac County, five weeks after suffering a stroke on his way home from the national Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) convention. He was 77.

What was the GAR? Grandpa’s obituary didn’t describe the GAR, a very political fraternal organization of veterans of the Union Army who served in the Civil War. The GAR, similar to mainstream veterans’ groups today, was so influential after its founding in 1866, one year after the Civil War ended, that no Republican was nominated to the presidency without GAR endorsement until 1908.

The obituary continues: “The deceased was born in a log cabin in Oct. 22, 1849 near West Bend.” Wait a minute! If he was born in 1849, how could he have been a Union soldier?

In the next paragraph we learn: “Mr. Giffey’s service in the war was twice refused because of his youth. The first time he enlisted he got to Milwaukee and the second time he was returned from St. Louis. Finally, at the age of 14, he was accepted as a drummer boy. He celebrated his 15th birthday at Appomattox Courthouse (Virginia), where he was on duty. He was a member of Co. I, 17th Wisconsin Volunteers. He participated in Sherman’s march to the sea, and was imprisoned in the Libby prison (Richmond, Virginia) for two months. He was wounded in the leg and captured at the battle of Wilcox Ridge. This wound caused him to limp the rest of his life, and he carried a cane during his last years.”

My brother’s research indicates that our great-grandmother signed a consent form stipulating that her son was 17 years old when, in fact, he wasn’t even 15. She probably received $200 or $300 as a “substitute fee” paid by a conscripted person prosperous enough to pay the fee and avoid military service. That fee could be compared to deferments enjoyed by college students during the Vietnam War. Wealth and military service have long been incompatible.

What could motivate a teenager to so eagerly march off to probable death? Did Herman see himself as freeing the slaves? I doubt it. Probably, as my brother suggested, he was tired of milking cows and the Union army needed bodies.

One hundred years after my grandfather was discharged from service, I was drafted and sent to Vietnam. In the 43 years since I returned from that war, I’ve puzzled over my motives as well. A burning desire to sacrifice myself in order to “keep America free” never entered my thoughts. America wasn’t endangered, as we have learned, by that civil war in Southeast Asia. I went to war under orders. The fact that my name isn’t among the 1.3 million Americans killed outright in wars since 1775 is a matter of pure luck. So, while my heart is emptied at Memorial Day each year at the thought of loved ones grieving for their lost soldiers, I can’t restrain myself from asking: Why war?

With that question in mind, we embarked on another walk last Saturday along part of Highway 14. It was the 140th time since the beginning of the current war in Iraq six years ago that I’ve walked along the road carrying a sign saying “Peace.” The day was pleasant, calm and cloudless. Most people passing by ignored us. A few waved and gave us the peace sign. Fewer still were hostile and gave us half of the peace sign.

Two days later during Memorial Day programs in two River Valley schools I listened to the solemn recitation of hundreds of names of local veterans now dead. The roll calls were long and growing longer.

I’ve heard the term “Nobody wants war” while observing citizens near and far embrace war after war. And I’ve also observed, with wonder, how the word “peace” elicits angry responses. If I could talk to my grandfather, I’d tell him that I think war isn’t inevitable, that peace is attainable and not just another story.

David Giffey is the editor of Long Shadows: Veterans’ Paths to Peace.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

A tidal wave of consequences from war

Wisconsin State Journal

SAT., MAY 23, 2009 - 12:56 PM

By FRANCES WIEDENHOEFT

It recently occurred to me -- abruptly -- that it is 2009.

I am home again, and America has been at war in Iraq for six years.

America has been in Afghanistan for eight years to help stabilize the country and oust the terrorists who are becoming more obscure with each passing week.

I have been home from Iraq for a year, but this return has been a gradual one. The distraction of the previous year left me feeling weak and unavailable to those I love.

One of many tools I have been using to help clear my mind of the debris of my involvement in six years of war is a specific type of therapy at the Veterans Administration mental health clinic. The therapy is useful and helping me. But initially, I was quite skeptical.

The underlying principal of the therapy, as I understand it, is to confront and resolve our internal moral conflicts related to the war. It was difficult for me to grasp how this would work, because I believe that the fundamental nature of war is a moral conflict.

Our American wars, cynics aside, have been fought at least in principle to defend or save a group of people, except that to save this group of people we need to kill another group of people.

To those of us down on the ground, the picture becomes muddled, and our hearts and souls are the casualties. It doesn't surprise me that so many soldiers are committing suicide. It is a testament to the strength of our soldiers and their families that more are not doing so.

The fundamental moral conflict of war to each individual involved is that killing is meant to be disturbing, horrifying to the human soul. Killing the enemy can be intellectually justified, but war is not discreet, and we witness daily, hourly, the civilian deaths, women, children, elders.

Everyone intimately involved in the process, killing, saving lives, is wounded in ways that do not heal. This is the essence of the human cost of war on our soldiers. These moral conflicts are irresolvable, and not easy to make peace with.

So what do we, as a nation, do?

We should take the instrument of war from our national tool bag only as an absolute last resort, after all other measures have been exhausted, and with brutal appraisal of the human cost, including our own soldiers' psyches.

Fortunately, I have the enduring support of family and community, and the benefit of friendship with older veterans of previous conflicts who have generously shared their experience and shown by example that we can learn to live with our ghosts and demons, and have a full life.

We return and try to pass on this tiny bit of hard-earned truth, that once we resort to war we have unleashed a tidal wave of consequences, most unintended, with damage that can't be undone.

We, the veterans, can be a voice, supported by experience, adamantly maintaining the use of war only as a last resort, and not as the primary means to carry out national policy.

(In memory of Sid Podell)

Frances Wiedenhoeft is a Lieutenant Colonel in the Army Reserve. She served in Desert Storm 1991, Afghanistan 2003, and Iraq 2007-2008. When not on active duty she works as a nurse anesthetist at the University of Wisconsin Hospital, enjoys time with her daughter and grandsons, and is active in Chapter 25 Veterans for Peace, and veterans groups to support peace, justice, and the welfare of our returning service members.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

Following Conscience Should Not Be Punished, Deserves Support


Op-ed submission to my local paper, The Leader Telegram. They never published it...

In Saturday’s paper you ran an AP article saying that Army Reserve member Kristoffer Walker who went AWOL had “received his punishment” as though he was due punishment for following his conscience. This train of thought leads to people blindly following orders which we learned from the Nuremberg trials is not how military personnel should act. His punishment shows that the U.S. military condemns the act of not blindly following orders which is wrong. After his superiors failed to advance his request for a transfer out of Iraq, Kristoffer made the difficult choice to follow his conscience.

By doing so, Kristoffer showed that he had considered the actions he would be taking by redeploying in support an illegal and immoral war of aggression which has been condemned by just war theory. His act of conscience was not the first and will not be the last as the U.S. seems committed to occupy Iraq and deny the Iraqi people self-determination until 2012 if not longer. Kristoffer joins a group of military members and veterans who say that we must act as our conscience directs and not blindly commit acts.

As a former military member, whose conscience was deeply troubled when the invasion and occupation of Iraq began near the end of my military service, I support Kristoffer and others like Matthis Chiroux. When I was in the military there were no public refusals to deploy and I felt alone to be contemplating such issues. Kristoffer is not alone today as there are thousands who have gone AWOL, deserted, or otherwise followed their conscience in opposition to this illegal occupation. In support of Matthis, I am attending his court martial for refusing an Inactive Ready Reserve call-up from the Army last year in St. Louis on Tuesday and I urge others to support our military members who are strong enough to follow their conscience.

Todd E. Dennis

U.S. Navy 1997-2003

Eleva, WI

A Tribute to Lindy Blake, Vietnam War Resister



Sent via the Displaced Films (Sir! No Sir!) listserv:

Dear Friends,

Below is a beautiful tribute to Lindy Blake, one of the Presidio 27 mutineers, written by his friend and comrade Randy Rowland (who, along with Keith Mather, told the story of the Presidio 27 in Sir! No Sir!). Lindy died recently at his home in Canada, where he has lived since escaping the Presidio stockade in 1968.

Lindy’s Great Escape

It was 40 years ago. We were all young. Facing a potential deathsentence for singing “We Shall Overcome,” the 27 “mutineers”held a meeting in the cell block of the Presidio Stockade. Everyone who could escape should, we decided. We were not cooperating with theBrass, not even to participate in their kangaroo court-marital. Notlong after, some of the Presido 27 did escape. Walter Pawlowski, theguy who stood up during our sit-down, to read our demands to thecommandant, was one of the escapees. Keith Mather, one of the “9-For-Peace,” and the contact I was supposed to meet up with when Iarrived in the stockade, was another. They were recognizableringleaders in the stockade protest which became known as thePresidio Mutiny. They had good reason to leave. Even before the sit-down strike, both were already facing many years in prison for GIresistance to the US invasion and occupation of Viet Nam. Now theyfaced additional charges of mutiny, the most serious of militaryoffenses. Military regulations simply say “there is no maximumsentence” for mutiny.

Later, Lindy Blake and I, both “mutineers,” were cell mates in theprison ward of the post hospital when the first mutiny sentences camedown, for 14 and 16 years, given to the first two of the 27 to becourt martialed. I was the third ringleader, sent in to the stockadeby the movement after a guard had killed a prisoner. My mission hadbeen to learn what was going on inside, and find out what could beorganized to take the prisoners’ struggle to a higher level. Lindywas a free spirit from LA, a lanky, blond hippie dancing to his owntune through the stockade experience. He had refused to go to VietNam, and was facing five years at hard labor. He was quick to flash agrin, knew some yoga postions, and could sing all the words to everyBob Dylan song there ever was. In the photo of the sit down wherePawlowski stands up to read our demands, I can be seen directlybehind him, with glasses on. Lindy sits in front of Pawlowski, armslinked with Mike Marino and Ricky Dodd, looking over his shoulder atthe camera.

Now we were in this cell together, with the mandate to escape if wecould. Lindy and I decided this was as good a chance as we werelikely to get. We were outside the fence, but heavily guarded. Ourcement-walled cell was one of several lining both sides of a shortcorridor. A guard, who held the keys to each cell, was stationed inthe corridor. Another guard manned his post outside a locked gate notfar down the corridor, which separated the prison wing from the restof Letterman General Hospital. A third guard, a rover, armed with a .45, patrolled back and forth outside, covering both sides of theprison wing. We had an outside window and decided the best escape wasthrough its bars, so we arranged for a hack-saw blade to be smuggledin, and began to saw.

We only worked at night. One of us would stand watch at the celldoor, straining at the barred inspection port to catch the firstsight of an approaching guard. The other guy would saw, timing hisefforts to correspond to the 5 or so minutes when the roving guardwas on the other side of the building. To cover the sound of sawing,whoever was watching at the cell door would call down the corridor,asking the guards to turn up their radio. It was San Francisco, 1969.The guards were young too, and at night they tended to sit on eitherside of the mesh that separated them, listening to the FM. If theywere nice guys, they would turn up the music when asked, which keptthem from hearing the sound of our saw blade working the metal bar.If they were jerks, the lookout at the cell door would loud-talkthem, with non-stop begging or verbal abuse. Most of the time theywould turn it up just to drown him out. If they didn’t, his constantnagging provided the sonic cover needed to mask the sound of sawing.

The bars were fairly big, and the going slow. Each morning, when weknocked off for the day, we’d fill in the saw marks with soap, thenblend in the soap with dirt from the floor to make the bar lookwhole. It was tense work, stressful enough to give you the bad pit.If we were caught, it would mean many years of additional charges ontop of all the years we already faced. We only had one chance to getthis right, so we were determined, methodical, and very, verycareful. Finally we had one cut completed, and began on the next. Ourblade was already dull, but eventually we could take the big barcompletely out of the window and then soap it back into place tocover our progress. Each dawn we’d fill in our night’s work withthe bar of soap, dispose of the night’s debris, hide our saw bladeand collapse wearily into our bunks to sleep until the turn-key wouldkick us awake for morning count.

When we were about a week away from being done, I got a visit fromthe Catholic priest who served as my connection to the movement.“We’ve been talking it over, Randy,” he told me, “and wedon’t think you should escape.” His reasoning was sound: the otherrecognizable ringleaders had already escaped. If I fled as well,those still in custody would be left with no solid connection to themovement. He had a moral argument as well. I had been sent into thestockade to organize the protest and if I ran away, those who hadanswered the call to resist would be left to face the drum rollalone. It was the moral equivalent of the captain being the last oneoff the sinking ship.
I wasn’t eager to spend my life in a penitentiary. I was young andnewly married. I had put a lot of work and many tense nights into ourescape plot. But I immediately knew that the priest was right. Icouldn’t go. Back in the cell, I explained to Lindy my decision tostay, and pointed out as cheerfully as I could that there was nothingin the new situation that said that I couldn’t help him escape. Sothat night we started up our old routine, one at the cell door, onesawing at the window.
One time we thought that the plot was exposed. Thinking back, Ican’t remember why we thought that, but to get rid of the evidencewe ditched our hacksaw blade in a laundry hamper, hidden in our dirtysheets. Almost immediately we realized that we had panicked. But nowour blade was across the corridor in a little utility room. Somehowwe conned the turn-key into unlocking the cell to let one of us getinto the utility room barely long enough to retrieve the blade, whilethe other distracted the guard momentarily. That clown act blows thetop off any stress scale ever devised. Once back in the cell with ourprecious blade, and with the turn-key returned to his chair down thecorridor, we danced wildly, between the bunks, out of our minds withfear and excitement. Even now, I can hardly believe we managed toretrieve our blade, but somehow we did, and the work went on.

Then one day, not too long before we figured to be done with ournightly sawing, the guards put another prisoner into the cell withus, a guy we didn’t know. Since we didn’t know him, and didn’thave contact with the general prison population to get anyone else tovouch for him, we decided not to risk the plot by bringing him in onit. His presence in the little cell added a whole new level ofcomplexity to our efforts. We would be as boring as possible eachevening, and he would eventually drift off to sleep. Once he wassound asleep, one of us would take the cell door position, and calldown to the guards like usual, asking them to turn up the music. Onlynow, if they wouldn’t do it, we’d have to wait, because the plan Brazz we had used in the past to cover the noise of sawing would mostlikely wake our cellmate. But often enough the guards would turn uptheir radio, and whoever was at the window, minding the roveroutside, would begin to saw.
The lookout at the door had to watch for the guards in the corridor,and keep another eye on our cellmate. This guy turned out to be asound sleeper, and although he woke up a few times, he neverdiscovered our plot. It was incredibly tense, with the lookout jobthe worst, all worry and no activity. Sawing through steel with ahacksaw blade is tough but the guy with the blade had only to saw andto keep an eye out for the rover. Somehow, the act of sawing seemedto dissipate the tension. On the other hand, the lookout had to puthimself into a state of hyper alertness, to watch our sleepingcellmate, watch for the turn-key in the corridor, and count theminutes before the rover would most likely return to our side of thebuilding. We took turns in each position, not so much to relieve thesawman’s aching fingers, but to relieve the lookout’s stress.

Progress slowed down, but eventually the big night came. I don’tknow how we were able to bore our cellmate to sleep. Finally, at theappointed hour, in the wee hours of a dark night, we waited for therover to head to the other side of the building. Lindy stripped, toavoid having his clothes hang up on the jagged metal. I helped stuffhim through the hole. He dropped to the ground below. I handed down apillowcase full of broken window glass and other debris, threw himhis pants, and he scampered off, naked, into the darkness, sack underhis arm, pants over his shoulder, heading for a pre-arranged placewhere a car was supposed to be waiting to pick him up. That vision ofLindy, sprinting nude into the night, making a break for freedom, wasmy last look at him for many years.

Soaping the big bar back into place, I stuffed his bunk to make itlook like somebody was in it. The longer it took for the guards tonotice he was gone, the greater Lindy’s chances of making good hisget-away. Pleased, but already missing the company of my comrade, Isat for a while on the edge of my bunk. We had pulled it off! Filledwith both a big sense of victory and a huge empty place of sadness, Ifinally curled up and went to sleep.

The next morning, as usual, the turn-key opened the cell door andcame in, kicking each bunk to rouse the prisoners for morning count.At night they just periodically shine a flashlight through theinspection port to count bodies sleeping in bunks, but each morningthey made you get up. This particular morning started off as usual.The guard kicked our cellmate’s bunk, “Get up, get up!” hebarked. The cellmate stirred. The guard walked over to Lindy’s bunkand kicked it, repeating his command. Then he turned to my bunk. Therasp of his key in the lock had put me instantly awake, but I feignedsleep. He kicked my bunk and I pretended to be groggy. Lindy had beengone for hours, but there was no way I could know for sure that hehad been picked up by our co-conspirators on the outside. Determinedto stall as long as possible as a rear-guard action, I took extratime waking up. Finally I was dangling on the edge of my bunk whenthe guard turned back to Lindy, who had not moved. Kicking his bunkwith greater force, the guard yelled “Get up!” and yanked backLindy’s covers, only to realize there was no body in the bed.

Turning to me with a nervous look, the guard growled, “How manyprisoners are supposed to be in this cell?”

“I don’t know, you’re the turn-key,” I shrugged.

Nervously looking around the cell, he retreated back into thecorridor to consult the gate guard. I could hear them swearing downthe hall. In a couple minutes they both came into the cell, aviolation of prison protocol for the gate guard to come inside thegate. They didn’t know what to do. The roster listed threeprisoners, but the cell looked intact. If they reported a missingprisoner, and there was only supposed to be two of us, then theywould be laughingstocks, at best. If they failed to report a missingprisoner, on the assumption that the paperwork was wrong, they wouldbe in deep shit.

They nervously talked to each other while looking around the cell.After all those nights of high anxiety, I was calm. The cellmatereally didn’t know what was going on, but prisoners always enjoyseeing guards get some of their own medicine, so we just silently saton our bunks enjoying the show. The guards were ramping up, searchingthe cell now. There wasn’t really any place for a prisoner to hide,but they searched anyway. They looked under all the bunks. One ofthem walked over, picked up a towel off the floor, as if he expectedto see Lindy hiding beneath it. They were really nervous now, surethere was supposed to be three prisoners, but with no explanation forwhat might have happened. They went back out and consulted the rover.Soon enough all three were in the cell, demanding to know where thethird prisoner was. The cellmate truly didn’t know, and I playeddumb, offering them nothing to ease their situation. The rover, whois never supposed to come into a prisoner area with his weapon, wasnevertheless smarter than the other two and started methodicallyshaking the bars, determined to find an explanation. When he came tothe soaped bar, it pulled off in his hand. He pivoted, wild-eyed,face contorted, steel bar held out like it was some sort of vileobject. All three guards cried out like they’d been stung, andstampeded for the cell door, trying to get through all at once, intheir rush to sound the alarm. We were left behind to placidly eatour breakfast, in a cell with a gaping hole. It was a long time laterwhen somebody higher up the chain of command finally ordered theremaining prisoners be moved to a different, more secure cell.

Lindy had indeed been picked up at the designated place that night,and was spirited away to Vancouver, Canada, where he joined Matherand Pawlowski and a whole community of GI resisters living in exile.

It was almost exactly forty years ago that I helped Lindy escape fromjail. Now Lindy lays dying in this cabin. His grand daughter issoftly playing the old piano. Propped up in a hospital bed, in hisown living room, Lindy is surrounded by windows that look out on thetrees, mostly evergreens, which ring his giant garden. In his line ofvision are rhododendrons in bloom, sagging fences and hand-hewnsheds. A black tail deer stands mid-day in the yard, accepting thegenerosity of family and strangers who have gathered for this passing.

Lindy’s 3-corner fool’s hat, its velvet somewhat faded with age,hangs on a hook near the bed. He lies quietly, mostly sleeping, butarousing once in a while to flash his grin at some new arrival hereto pay him respects. Lindy’s time is measured in days, if not hours.The hospital opened him up, saw he was a goner, and merely suturedhim back up. They released him to spend his last days in the place heloves, among those who love him.

Both of his sons are here with their families. There is a scatteringof friends sitting in the yard. Neighbors drop in with food andsupplies. I notice that the women seem to curtsey or bow to Lindywhen they approach, flashing mischievous grins. They treat him withthe tenderness of old lovers, which-as it turns out-is pretty muchuniversally true.

This place is a hippie’s dream of back to nature. The house postsare pealed logs, some found on the beach nearby, and some harvestedfrom this patch of land on this remote Canadian Island. Walls andceilings are unfinished tongue and groove. The plywood floors arepainted in wild shades of blue and purple. Water comes from rainbarrels on the roof, electricity from solar panels. The room istoasty, heated by the warm rays of the spring sun, and a wood stove.
Lindy told me he knew in his heart for a long time that something waswrong with him. Then a few months back, part of a tree he was fellingstruck him in the chest. After that he attributed his escalating painto the blow, not to cancer. Finally Lindy drove himself to thehospital, and now, only a week or so later, we gather to bid himfarewell.

In response to my call that Lindy was dying, Keith Mather, one of thekey players in the Presidio Mutiny flew up from San Francisco.Together we drove north from Seattle, over the border, taking threeferries to this island, where there are no policemen, to stand by ourcomrade in his final hours.

One of the women who was with him during his short stay in thehospital tells us a classic Lindy story. At one point after receivinghis grim news, he held his breath, she told us, pretending to bedead. She fell for the gag, until he laughed and said “Got you!”

“I was yelling at him, ‘You BASTARD!’” she related in herQuebec French accent, “I was so mad at him. The nurses must havethought I was crazy.”

When Lindy called me from the hospital, to say his end was near, heremarked in that whimsical way of his, “Randy, it seems like I’malways escaping and leaving you behind.” As I sit beside him now,I’m thinking that the significance of a person’s demise iscommensurate with the value of their life. Sharing the prison cellwith Lindy, I learned lessons from him that I have treasured and heldtrue ever since. I’m up here now because he sat down then. I’msure that each person holding death-watch in this hand-made cabin,and many who are not right here, can testify how they, too, weretouched and enriched by rubbing alongside this amazing spirit, my oldcomrade.

My mental image of Lindy has always been of a lithe young man dressedin a three-corner fool’s hat, dancing gently to his own tune,through a happy crowd on a warm summer’s day. He never lost thatflop-eared grin, he never ceased being a free spirit. On April 9,2009, forty years after he escaped from the Presidio, Lindy Blake,Presidio 27 mutineer, lover of many, father of two, passed away inhis home on Cortes Island, at the mouth of Desolation Sound, inCanada. Keith Mather and I stood at his bedside and sang “We ShallOvercome” one last time for him.

I wrote the following while sitting by his bedside that day:

Free Spirits Will Always Escape

Its me, Lindy, the one who helped you peck your way From the cell so many years ago.
I have come, so you may take flight again.I was your co-conspirator then and I call you now,My hummingbird, my jailbird, my escapee.Hover about in the garden. Check the flowers.Peer in the window from time to time,Then flit on, as you will.

I’m here to remove our secret “bar of soap.”Here’s my hand, Brother, step up.Wiggle through the hole to freedom.

I have come for you.When the guards turn their backs,I’ll give you the signal, and once you’re gone,I’ll replace the bar to mask your retreat.Free Spirits will always escape.


Thursday, March 19, 2009

March 19th - A Day For Action

Originally published here...

We have now entered the seventh year of the occupation of Iraq. Many people feel the war is over and nothing is to be done. This is far from the truth of the situation surrounding us today.



About six years ago, I was being interviewed for a Quality Assurance Supervisor certification by my boat's (USS Santa Fe – SSN-763) Captain. The backdrop to our interview was a picture from the San Francisco demonstrations where a sign was made saying We Support Our Troops Who Shoot Their Officers and the officers in the wardroom joking about not giving me a gun. As someone who was silently opposed to the invasion of Iraq during my military service and was slowly becoming a pacifist, I felt this comment was inappropriate since I could never commit such an act. Just as we began the interview, the clip from Michael Moore's acceptance speech aired where he talks about living in fictitious times with a war based on lies and deception aired. Today these words which were not widely accepted ring true as we the U.S. is currently engaged in occupying two nations, Iraq and Afghanistan, with no plan for empowering the peoples of these countries with self-determination and control of their future beyond the continuing occupation.


Many may feel that talking about the past is not necessary at this point in history, after all we have the first minority president, the occupation of Iraq is ending (maybe), enlistment numbers are increasing due to the faltering economy, and there are many other issues facing this nation. However, we must reflect on the past and ask how we got to where we are today.

Past promises have been made and broken so we must step up and make the current promises come to fruition. A few months before leaving the military, I was told that the mission was accomplished in Iraq and that major combat operations were over. After the war began, I was frantically researching how to avoid supporting an occupation that I felt was unjust. I learned of a Marine who refused to deploy during the first Gulf War in 1991 from a base that was just a couple miles from where I lived in Hawaii at the time. Luckily because the war was declared over, I didn't have to make the same sacrifice that Jeff Paterson did and refuse to deploy with my submarine since our deployment was pushed back later into 2003. I was able to complete my enlistment and leave the military behind with no worry of being recalled like the over 58,000 who have been subjected to stop-loss and been sent to war after their enlistment ended. Now we hear that after over seven years, this program will be phased out, by the end of 2011 just as with the troop withdrawal there is plenty of time for this plan to change unless we demand that it end. We were told that Obama would end the occupation of Iraq and bring our troops home; since he has taken office he has instead shirked off this plan and instead is saying that up to 50,000 U.S. military members will be occupying Iraq until some unknown date . He has also escalated the occupation of Afghanistan with an additional 17,000 U.S. troops with no known plan for their use at a time when NATO countries are being asked to commit 4,000 more troops but few countries stepping forward to continue this occupation .


If we continue to sit back and allow military intervention be the plan for foreign policy and the refusal of self-determination for occupied countries we will continue to live as a country at war. We must take action to end the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. We must also take action to prevent U.S. aid from causing unnecessary death and suffering as we have seen with the aggressive behavior of Israel over the past years, including the use of banned munitions during the recent siege of Gaza


There are many ways to get involved. This weekend the ANSWER coalition is holding marches in DC, Los Angeles, and San Francisco on March 21st and there are other demonstrations around the country to mark the somber day called the anniversary of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. There will be an event at Civic Square/Clas Park in Milwaukee on Saturday. On April, 4th to mark the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech at the Riverside Church, United For Peace and Justice is holding a march in New York City, with local demonstrations planned in many communities like Madison.


It is clear as Obama as said himself that,


"I have always said that I don't think that the LGBT community should take its cues from me or some political leader in terms of what they think is right for them. Real change comes from the bottom up, not the top down."


We must build a movement to demand an end to the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan and take heed from past warnings about militarism from Eisenhower's Farewell Address,


"In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the militaryindustrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist…. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together."


and Dr. King at Riverside Church,


"War is not the answer. Communism will never be defeated by the use of atomic bombs or nuclear weapons. Let us not join those who shout war and, through their misguided passions, urge the United States to relinquish its participation in the United Nations…. We can no longer afford to worship the god of hate or bow before the altar of retaliation. The oceans of history are made turbulent by the ever-rising tides of hate. History is cluttered with the wreckage of nations and individuals that pursued this self-defeating path of hate."


Today we can substitute terrorism for communism and military aggression and occupation for atomic weapons. We must work to end militarism in all its forms in addition to ending the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan.


March 19th can be a day of reflection on the past but it must also be a day that we take action to move our demands forward to create the world we wish to see.

Todd Dennis is a U.S. Submarine Service veteran, a board member of the Clarence Kailin Chapter of Veterans For Peace and the President of the Madison Chapter of Iraq Veterans Against the War. He has B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wisconsin, will be receiving a B.S. in Physics in May and is awaiting word on his application for graduate school in peace studies.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

IVAW-Madison thanks concert attendees and silent auction donors for a successful fundraiser



Joan Baez Concert Benefits IVAW-Madison



True Endeavors, a local promoter that we have worked with in the past to table at local music shows, set up the event and arranged for IVAW-Madison to be the benefactor of $1 for each ticket sold for the Joan Baez concert on Saturday. We were chosen from a list of local non-profits by Baez. Thanks to each of the 810 people who purchased a ticket and attended the show and thanks to True Endeavors for suggesting IVAW as a benefactor.



IVAW-Madison also thanks all of those who helped us hold up a silent auction at the event. Thanks to donations from the following businesses, authors, and artists we were also able to raise an additional $800:



During the current troubling economic times it was difficult to be turned away from many other local businesses that were unable to donate towards the silent auction so we are especially grateful to those that could help us out. If you visit any of these businesses please thank them for supporting our work through their donation to our silent auction.